Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship
Craig Steven Wright
本文重新将同行评审概念化为结构化公共评议。传统学术验证机制受限于匿名性、延迟性和把关控制。我们提出一种透明、身份关联且可复现的学术评价体系，以开放评议为基础。通过利用区块链实现不可篡改的审计追踪，借助人工智能进行迭代综合，我们设计了一个激励智力贡献、捕捉认知演进、实现可追溯声誉动态的框架。该模型赋能从计算科学到人文的各个领域，将学术知识重新定义为动态过程而非静态凭证。
This paper reconceptualises peer review as structured public commentary. Traditional academic validation is hindered by anonymity, latency, and gatekeeping. We propose a transparent, identity-linked, and reproducible system of scholarly evaluation anchored in open commentary. Leveraging blockchain for immutable audit trails and AI for iterative synthesis, we design a framework that incentivises intellectual contribution, captures epistemic evolution, and enables traceable reputational dynamics. ...
